[xquery-talk] BumbleBee XQuery Test Harness
sander at x-hive.com
Thu Oct 16 11:30:10 PDT 2003
> > I think we produce the result in the right way, so surrounded by a
> > results element? But BumbleBee does not like it.
> Yes, you are correct. That also is fixed in 1.0.1.
'fraid not, it just went from 596 such errors to 546, e.g.
Expected Possible Result 1:
Failure Message 1:
Expected node type '3' but was '1' - comparing <BumbleBee_Result ...>
P0M </BumbleBee_Result> at /BumbleBee_Result/text() to
<results...> at /BumbleBee_Result/results
Because of these errors, is it reasonable to assume that none of the
products you wrote adapters for currently have a close to 100% score on
all the tests?
Your other changes helped quite a bit. We now have an 83.3% (*) score on
the usecases tests (I may as well say it as I attach an Adapter for
X-Hive/DB). We have failures in Strong.bee because we do not implement
import schema yet, and errors in R.bee that we have to look into
I attached my adapter implementation for X-Hive/DB as indicated that I
would yesterday, maybe it can be useful to others.
*) with doc -> document rewrite in adapter and adjustment of
declarations in queries to latest spec.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6896 bytes
Url : http://xquery.com/pipermail/talk/attachments/20031016/023480af/XhiveAdapter-0001.obj
More information about the talk