[xquery-talk] range implementations -- which is correct?
mhk at mhk.me.uk
Wed Jun 22 10:07:33 PDT 2005
> What's led to the revised view that EBV( atomic-sequence ) is
> an error?
It's more consistent with the rest of the language. The old rule for EBV was
clinging to the XPath 1.0 "nothing is an error" style, whereas the XPath 2.0
philosophy is to report errors when the user does something that doesn't
More information about the talk