[xquery-talk] performance figures for xquery processors
fcohen at rainingdata.com
Tue Feb 7 10:18:35 PST 2006
Hi Manava: Great questions. Evaluating XQuery performance greatly
depends on the use case and what technology you apply against it. For
instance, parsing a complex document that uses the automotive
industry Business Object Document (BOD) schema will highlight
performance of some XQuery implementations while parsing simple RSS
feeds will show other products in a favorable light.
My preference is to test XQuery implementations against three use cases:
1) Parsing big and complex XML documents. The documents are typically
10K to 5 Mbytes. For instance, an HL7 document or BOD. In this case I
recommend using an XML binding compiler like JAXB that can address
2) Parsing XML documents that contain many elements that are not
nested deeper than 2-3 elements deep. Think of a stream of data where
skipping unwanted elements yields a performance advantage. In this
case a Streaming XML (StAX) approach works best.
3) Parsing medium sized documents with a little bit of complexity.
For example, a purchase order from a manufacturer where you need to
evaluate every element. In this case an XML parser using DOM may be
Each of the XQuery implementations uses a different underlying
approach to XML parsing. They all use different mechanisms to access
XML data from a database (some come with a native XML persistence
engine, some map to JDBC sources.) This variety means there is a good
chance that you will find an XQuery implementation that will meet
Here are some performance and scalability resources that you may find
FastSOA architecture for solving SOA's scalability and performance
problems. Details are at http://www.xquerynow.com/library/fastsoa
TestMaker is my open-source framework and utility for load testing.
Details are at: http://www.pushtotest.com/Downloads/features.html
SOA Performance and Scalability Kit is a free kit to evaluate XML-
based SOA in your own environment. Details are at: http://
Hope this helps.
On Feb 6, 2006, at 3:52 PM, <manavaputra at yahoo.com>
<manavaputra at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Wonder, if any one has done performance testing on
> xquery processors that have java API and has some data
> to share with. I have recently picked saxon for xquery
> because of its reputation with XSLT and also being
> used for conformance testing in the xquery
> standardisation process. I am not sure if there is a
> good competitor that i could evaluate and compare. If
> there is one, please do recommend it to me.
> What i have done on my side are a couple of simple
> tests on saxon document loading and xpath expression
> evaluation in saxon versus the Xpath that is built
> into Java5(I believe it is the same as what used to
> JAXP xpath in java 4). Here is what i found. Saxon
> documents take a longer to build and load and consume
> a more of the java heap size, but their xpath
> expression evaluations are much faster. Also the
> memory it consumes for the evaluation seems to be less
> compared to Java5 xpath. For the same document and
> same xpath expressions that lead to a large number of
> results, the java5 xpath expression evaluation was
> eating up all the heap while saxon xquery processor
> yielded the results. Since java5 does not support
> xquery, i could not evaluate FLWOR expressions and
> other xquery specific stuff.
> I would like any other insights into saxon's
> xpath/xquery peroformance either by itself or in
> comparison with other xquery processors.
> Thanks a lot
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> talk at xquery.com
More information about the talk