[xquery-talk] performance figures for xquery processors
yuin at bb.din.or.jp
Wed Feb 8 15:32:45 PST 2006
Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie at datadirect.com> wrote:
> 2. Returning entire XML documents, Extracting portions of very large XML
> documents. (which many XML databases do very well)
> What else do y'all think should be addressed by standard benchmarks?
Yet about scenarios..
I think serialization (Result sequence to XML) time
should be separated, or such scenarios is required.
Because some user programs (that uses XQuery)
may not require bulk/entire result at a time.
XQuery query results tends to be redundant/fat than
relational's obviously, so something like DB cursor feature
is required for large documents handling, just my opinion.
Sequence items might be lazily generated in some impl.
# The attempt to cooperate of PL and QL more closely
# is what proposed with XLINQ etc.
Nara Institute of Science and Technology (NAIST)
Makoto YUI <yuin405 AT gmail.com>
More information about the talk