[xquery-talk] JSON query processing

Adam Retter adam.retter at googlemail.com
Sat Oct 15 02:52:57 PDT 2011


> While my presentation balisage this year was on this topic exactly - how to
> get JSON and XML to be nice friends ...
>
> http://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol7/html/Lee01/BalisageVol7-Lee01.html

Very interesting!
Did you address the issue of XML with mixed content typically found in
more document based approaches, e.g. <p>hello <b>world</b> its a nice
day</p>, I scanned the paper but not come across an example. I may
have missed something?

> I am somewhat concerned about "Fixing" JSON by adding things XML has (like
> XSD, XSLT etc ...)
>
> by the time we add everything to JSON to make as useful as XML it will be as
> complicated as XML,
>
> and then we'll be having discussions about "Micro JSON".

Indeed.

>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
> David A. Lee
>
> dlee at calldei.com
>
> http://www.xmlsh.org
>
>
>
> From: talk-bounces at x-query.com [mailto:talk-bounces at x-query.com] On Behalf
> Of Francis Upton
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 6:10 PM
> To: xquery-discuss Talk
> Subject: Re: [xquery-talk] JSON query processing
>
>
>
> P.S. the first one who has the courage to say that XML and JSON should
> co-exist
> non only peacefully, but in close harmony, has all my respects. (I think so,
>  but I didn't dare to  say it publicly  :-)
>
> I will say it. I think JSON is a nice syntax and can be more compact and
> readable than XML. Last I looked (which was a while ago), they did not have
> any standard means of specification (like XSD), so that needs to be fixed.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk at x-query.com
> http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk at x-query.com
> http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>



-- 
Adam Retter

skype: adam.retter
tweet: adamretter
http://www.adamretter.org.uk



More information about the talk mailing list