[xquery-talk] xquery technology now ready?

[Misztur, Chris]

For me it is what fits right now and xquery fits perfectly.

Can you describe practical and cost effective?

-c





On Dec 11, 2013, at 8:31 AM, "e-letter" <inpost at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10/12/2013, Christian Grün <christian.gruen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From all the recommendations, is it correct to assume that a dedicated
>>> web server will need to be used, where permissions are provided to
>>> install these various software products?
>>
>> If you simply want to learn the language, there is no need to look out
>> for professional hosting solutions. Some XQuery implementations come
>> with their own web server code, and they are often pretty light-weight
>> (and can also be run locally). As Adam indicated, if you are looking
>> for open source solutions, you could have a look at BaseX (disclaimer:
>> I’m contributing to this project), or eXist-db, which are both easy to
>> install, and check out the included examples.
>>
>
> The problem with the general lack of widespread deployment of xquery
> is a risk of disappointment similar to xforms. I would like to learn
> xquery with the knowledge that practical deployment is possible and
> cost effective; otherwise the technology doesn't seem ready yet and so
> sql database + sever script language remains the option.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk at x-query.com
> http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk

________________________________

The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail