gandhi.mukul at gmail.com
Sat Feb 1 12:37:12 PST 2014
you're right. The answer to this question is 9.
I've checked with two XPath 2.0 (i'm assuming XQuery 1.0) processors, and
this answer is correct.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, David Lee <dlee at calldei.com> wrote:
> You would be mistaken
> Try it
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 1, 2014, at 1:41 AM, "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think, this is sequence of 7 items. As far as I can recall, the
> internal sequence (4,5,6) won't be expanded to get the size of outer
> sequence and would contribute one item to this result.
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Misztur, Chris <CMisztur at macleanfogg.com>wrote:
>> Is this a sequence of 7 or 9 items?
>> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential.
>> Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it
>> without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive
>> any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without
>> the permission of the author.
>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk